The jury was very impressed with the range and quality of the design submissions. The competitors showed an unbounded interest and energy to find an appropriate solution to the challenge of housing in general and to responding appropriately to the site in particular. Many designs were original and thought-provoking,others were richly developed in detail and atmosphere.
The jury noted several common themes,including :
Porosity- the notion that fairly high density dwelling groups did not need to be monolithic, but that individual dwellings could be more porous to the outdoors, the site, to other dwellings andto the street and city,
Threshold: the importance of a clear boundary or threshold to a dwelling within a group of dwellings.this may take the form of a courtyard, a porch , an overhang or a tree to clearly delineate between public and private space.
Mixing and overlap: the informal and often fortuitous overlap of activities and relationships in a group of dwellings
Residential typology- there was great interest in defining the typology of the family dwelling in the early 21st century.
The jury observed that there is a pressing need for architects and planners to invent new forms of urban living. As our cities grow more dense, public transportation improves, and building costs escalate,what are the appropriate forms of dwelling for ordinary families? As millennials, families with children and baby boomers all seek to live close to the center of cities, how can architects provide more appropriate forms of dwelling in the urban realm. As one juror said "there is an open market to reinvent housing now"
The jury applauded this group of architects and designers of attempting to address the challenge of urban housing in the 21st century and for sketching out some promising lines of thought about new homes in the contemporary city.